<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>Chessproblems</title>
        <description>Chess Problems for Study and Pleasure</description>
        <link>http://www.chessproblems.com/</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 23:50:35 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.2</generator>
        <item>
            <title>Comment 4241 - from problem 3120</title>
            <link>http://www.chessproblems.com/prob.php?id=3120</link>
            <description>mclou: Shows great imagination!!</description>
            <author>mclou</author>
            <comments>http://www.chessproblems.com/comment.php?prob=3120</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 23:19:20 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.chessproblems.com/prob.php?id=3120</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Comment 4240 - from problem 3315</title>
            <link>http://www.chessproblems.com/prob.php?id=3315</link>
            <description>papadoble: :-)</description>
            <author>papadoble</author>
            <comments>http://www.chessproblems.com/comment.php?prob=3315</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 08:39:18 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.chessproblems.com/prob.php?id=3315</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Comment 4239 - from problem 3308</title>
            <link>http://www.chessproblems.com/prob.php?id=3308</link>
            <description>mrmip: Kf4 also now accepted as 'extended duck walk' ;-)</description>
            <author>mrmip</author>
            <comments>http://www.chessproblems.com/comment.php?prob=3308</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 09:17:54 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.chessproblems.com/prob.php?id=3308</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Comment 4238 - from problem 3310</title>
            <link>http://www.chessproblems.com/prob.php?id=3310</link>
            <description>papadoble: Hey there, good problem! Made me recall Herlin's pb 3312. What do you think, are the two problems somehow related?</description>
            <author>papadoble</author>
            <comments>http://www.chessproblems.com/comment.php?prob=3310</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 08:45:45 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.chessproblems.com/prob.php?id=3310</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Comment 4237 - from problem 3312</title>
            <link>http://www.chessproblems.com/prob.php?id=3312</link>
            <description>papadoble: Arrrg, my comments are wron! This was supposed to be on Coyote's 3310...
As about pb 3314, we shall see!</description>
            <author>papadoble</author>
            <comments>http://www.chessproblems.com/comment.php?prob=3312</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 08:38:38 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.chessproblems.com/prob.php?id=3312</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Comment 4236 - from problem 3312</title>
            <link>http://www.chessproblems.com/prob.php?id=3312</link>
            <description>papadoble: This reminded me strongly of Herlin's 4 corners (or is it only 3?), see pb 3314</description>
            <author>papadoble</author>
            <comments>http://www.chessproblems.com/comment.php?prob=3312</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 08:34:46 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.chessproblems.com/prob.php?id=3312</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Comment 4235 - from problem 3294</title>
            <link>http://www.chessproblems.com/prob.php?id=3294</link>
            <description>papadoble: Interesting! Thanks for the explanations :-)</description>
            <author>papadoble</author>
            <comments>http://www.chessproblems.com/comment.php?prob=3294</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 21:06:59 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.chessproblems.com/prob.php?id=3294</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Comment 4234 - from problem 3308</title>
            <link>http://www.chessproblems.com/prob.php?id=3308</link>
            <description>papadoble: Nice duck walk! :-)
Kf4 on last move must be correct too or I am missing something big.</description>
            <author>papadoble</author>
            <comments>http://www.chessproblems.com/comment.php?prob=3308</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 21:02:21 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.chessproblems.com/prob.php?id=3308</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Comment 4233 - from problem 3294</title>
            <link>http://www.chessproblems.com/prob.php?id=3294</link>
            <description>Coyote: Yes, the rook isn't really needed, but I included it to encourage tries such as 8/2rpp3/3k4/3PP3/3K4/8/8/8 and 8/8/3ppr2/4k3/3PP3/4K3/8/8, both of which might seem possible at first glance.  Tastes differ on these matters--I chose 'puzzlement' over 'economy' :)</description>
            <author>Coyote</author>
            <comments>http://www.chessproblems.com/comment.php?prob=3294</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 23:48:32 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.chessproblems.com/prob.php?id=3294</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Comment 4232 - from problem 3299</title>
            <link>http://www.chessproblems.com/prob.php?id=3299</link>
            <description>Kiccuz42: manually inserted the wrong variations and changed a bit the problem to make them look like tries</description>
            <author>Kiccuz42</author>
            <comments>http://www.chessproblems.com/comment.php?prob=3299</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 23:14:45 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.chessproblems.com/prob.php?id=3299</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Comment 4231 - from problem 3299</title>
            <link>http://www.chessproblems.com/prob.php?id=3299</link>
            <description>papadoble: The applet is wron here again, 1.b3? is  not refuted.</description>
            <author>papadoble</author>
            <comments>http://www.chessproblems.com/comment.php?prob=3299</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 22:41:14 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.chessproblems.com/prob.php?id=3299</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Comment 4230 - from problem 3294</title>
            <link>http://www.chessproblems.com/prob.php?id=3294</link>
            <description>mrmip: Or why not a queen?</description>
            <author>mrmip</author>
            <comments>http://www.chessproblems.com/comment.php?prob=3294</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 19:54:51 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.chessproblems.com/prob.php?id=3294</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Comment 4229 - from problem 3293</title>
            <link>http://www.chessproblems.com/prob.php?id=3293</link>
            <description>papadoble: Repaired</description>
            <author>papadoble</author>
            <comments>http://www.chessproblems.com/comment.php?prob=3293</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 19:27:22 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.chessproblems.com/prob.php?id=3293</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Comment 4228 - from problem 3293</title>
            <link>http://www.chessproblems.com/prob.php?id=3293</link>
            <description>dmeng: There's two solutions, but you've acknowledged one.</description>
            <author>dmeng</author>
            <comments>http://www.chessproblems.com/comment.php?prob=3293</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 16:28:49 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.chessproblems.com/prob.php?id=3293</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Comment 4227 - from problem 3294</title>
            <link>http://www.chessproblems.com/prob.php?id=3294</link>
            <description>papadoble: I missed the solution of this excellent composition. The king is a piece! And model mate. Forces are used very efficiently, but for the rook, why not a pawn instead?</description>
            <author>papadoble</author>
            <comments>http://www.chessproblems.com/comment.php?prob=3294</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 15:13:55 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.chessproblems.com/prob.php?id=3294</guid>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>
